<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are screwy CAD models ruining your upfront CFD ROI?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lifeupfront.com/2008/06/10/are-screwy-cad-models-ruining-your-upfront-cfd-roi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lifeupfront.com/2008/06/10/are-screwy-cad-models-ruining-your-upfront-cfd-roi/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=are-screwy-cad-models-ruining-your-upfront-cfd-roi</link>
	<description>Getting ahead with CAE, direct modeling, and creative engineering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 02:39:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrek Cooper</title>
		<link>http://lifeupfront.com/2008/06/10/are-screwy-cad-models-ruining-your-upfront-cfd-roi/comment-page-1/#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrek Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeupfront.com/2008/06/10/are-screwy-cad-models-ruining-your-upfront-cfd-roi/#comment-842</guid>
		<description>Well said.. I think a common opinion is that the CFD/FEA vendor will come in and &quot;mess up&quot; the system. To me, put them to the test. They should be able to come in and fully adapt to your current process.

Do you use Design Tables, Configurations, Level of Details, Simplified Reps? If so, then you should be able to adopt the analysis modeling philosophy seamlessly into your process, not create a completely separate foreign process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said.. I think a common opinion is that the CFD/FEA vendor will come in and &#8220;mess up&#8221; the system. To me, put them to the test. They should be able to come in and fully adapt to your current process.</p>
<p>Do you use Design Tables, Configurations, Level of Details, Simplified Reps? If so, then you should be able to adopt the analysis modeling philosophy seamlessly into your process, not create a completely separate foreign process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
